Re: [RFC PATCH V2 01/12] fs/stat: Define DAX statx attribute

[Dan Williams]

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:18 PM Darrick J. Wong
<darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:05:00PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:39 PM Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > [..]
> > > >         attempts to minimize software cache effects for both I/O and
> > > >         memory mappings of this file.  It requires a file system which
> > > >         has been configured to support DAX.
> > > >
> > > >         DAX generally assumes all accesses are via cpu load / store
> > > >         instructions which can minimize overhead for small accesses, but
> > > >         may adversely affect cpu utilization for large transfers.
> > > >
> > > >         File I/O is done directly to/from user-space buffers and memory
> > > >         mapped I/O may be performed with direct memory mappings that
> > > >         bypass kernel page cache.
> > > >
> > > >         While the DAX property tends to result in data being transferred
> > > >         synchronously, it does not give the same guarantees of
> > > >         synchronous I/O where data and the necessary metadata are
> > > >         transferred together.
> > >
> > > (I'm frankly not sure that synchronous I/O actually guarantees that the
> > > metadata has hit stable storage...)
> >
> > Oh? That text was motivated by the open(2) man page description of O_SYNC.
>
> Eh, that's just me being cynical about software.  Yes, the O_SYNC docs
> say that data+metadata are supposed to happen; that's good enough for
> another section in the man pages. :)
>

Ah ok, yes, "all storage is a lie".