Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] fixes for atmel-hlcdc

[Sam Ravnborg]

Hi Lee.

> > >   ("drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock than requested")
> > > 
> > > Claudiu Beznea (5):
> > >   drm: atmel-hlcdc: use double rate for pixel clock only if supported
> > >   drm: atmel-hlcdc: enable clock before configuring timing engine
> > 
> > >   mfd: atmel-hlcdc: add struct device member to struct
> > >     atmel_hlcdc_regmap
> > >   mfd: atmel-hlcdc: return in case of error
> > 
> > Would it be OK to apply the to drm-misc-next, or shal they go in via
> > your mfd tree?
> 
> How are they related to the other patches?  Do they have build-time
> dependencies on any of the other patches, or vice versa? 
No build time dependencies.

But from the description of "atmel-hlcdc: return in case of error":
"
For HLCDC timing engine configurations bit ATMEL_HLCDC_SIP of
ATMEL_HLCDC_SR needs to be polled before applying new config.
"
I get that changing timing for the HLCDC may fail if these
patches are not applied.
So it is only to have updated hlcdc support in drm-misc-next
for further testing.

	Sam