Re: [PATCH v3 01/19] x86/msr-index: Clean up bit defines for IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR

[Borislav Petkov]

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 07:12:22PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> As pointed out by Boris, the defines for bits in IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL
> are quite a mouthful, especially the VMX bits which must differentiate
> between enabling VMX inside and outside SMX (TXT) operation.  Rename the
> bit defines to abbreviate FEATURE_CONTROL as FEAT_CTL so that they're a
> little friendlier on the eyes.  Keep the full name for the MSR itself to
> help even the most obtuse reader decipher the abbreviation, and to match
> the name used by the Intel SDM.
> 
> Opportunistically fix a few other annoyances with the defines:
> 
>   - Relocate the bit defines so that they immediately follow the MSR
>     define, e.g. aren't mistaken as belonging to MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL.
>   - Add whitespace around the block of feature control defines to make
>     it clear that FEAT_CTL is indeed short for FEATURE_CONTROL.
>   - Use BIT() instead of manually encoding the bit shift.
>   - Use "VMX" instead of "VMXON" to match the SDM.
>   - Append "_ENABLED" to the LMCE bit to be consistent with the verbiage
>     used for all other feature control bits.  (LCME is an acronym for
>     Local Machine Check Exception, i.e. LMCE_ENABLED is not redundant).

Sure but SDM calls it LMCE_ON. What is our current decision on sticking
to SDM bit names? I guess we don't...

But above you say "to match the SDM"...

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette