Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] kasan: No KASAN's memmove check if archs don't have it.

[Paul Walmsley]

Hello Andrey, Alexander, Dmitry,

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, Nick Hu wrote:

> If archs don't have memmove then the C implementation from lib/string.c is used,
> and then it's instrumented by compiler. So there is no need to add KASAN's
> memmove to manual checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Hu <nickhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

If you're happy with this revision of this patch, could you please ack it 
so we can merge it as part of the RISC-V KASAN patch set? 

Or if you'd prefer to take this patch yourself, please let me know.


- Paul

> ---
>  mm/kasan/common.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
> index 6814d6d6a023..897f9520bab3 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/common.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ void *memset(void *addr, int c, size_t len)
>  	return __memset(addr, c, len);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_MEMMOVE
>  #undef memmove
>  void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t len)
>  {
> @@ -115,6 +116,7 @@ void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t len)
>  
>  	return __memmove(dest, src, len);
>  }
> +#endif
>  
>  #undef memcpy
>  void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t len)
> -- 
> 2.17.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> 


- Paul