Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] cpuidle: Use the latency to call find_deepest_idle_state

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Wed Nov 13 2019 - 17:20:02 EST


On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 7:54 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> As the dev->use_latency is filled with the latency value when this
> function is called, use it as a parameter to the
> find_deepest_idle_state() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> index f68a6c9e8482..659d8b1ece6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ void cpuidle_use_latency(unsigned int latency)
> int cpuidle_find_deepest_state(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> {
> - return find_deepest_state(drv, dev, UINT_MAX, 0, false);
> + return find_deepest_state(drv, dev, dev->use_latency, 0, false);

This breaks the suspend-to-idle case when ->enter_s2idle is NULL for
all of the enabled states, because the latency limit for forced idle
should not be applied then.

Maybe pass the latency limit to cpuidle_find_deepest_state() and
rearrange the code in cpuidle_idle_call() to use U64_MAX in the s2idle
case.

BTW, note that find_deepest_state() will take a u64 latency limit in
ns now (and going forward).

> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> --