Re: mm/swap: possible problem introduced when replacing REQ_NOIDLE with REQ_IDLE

From: Pavel Tikhomirov
Date: Mon Nov 11 2019 - 09:52:16 EST


Christoph, a2b809672ee6 is your patch, maybe you have some ideas about
these problem?

ping

On 8/9/19 11:39 AM, Pavel Tikhomirov wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> Then porting patches from mainstream I've found some strange code:
>
> > commit a2b809672ee6fcb4d5756ea815725b3dbaea654e
> > Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue Nov 1 07:40:09 2016 -0600
> >
> > block: replace REQ_NOIDLE with REQ_IDLE
> >
> > Noidle should be the default for writes as seen by all the compounds
> > definitions in fs.h using it. In fact only direct I/O really should
> > be using NODILE, so turn the whole flag around to get the defaults
> > right, which will make our life much easier especially onces the
> > WRITE_* defines go away.
> >
> > This assumes all the existing "raw" users of REQ_SYNC for writes
> > want noidle behavior, which seems to be spot on from a quick audit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> > index ccedccb28ec8..46a74209917f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > @@ -197,11 +197,11 @@ typedef int (dio_iodone_t)(struct kiocb *iocb,
> loff_t offset,
> > #define WRITE REQ_OP_WRITE
> >
> > #define READ_SYNC 0
> > -#define WRITE_SYNC (REQ_SYNC | REQ_NOIDLE)
> > -#define WRITE_ODIRECT REQ_SYNC
> > -#define WRITE_FLUSH (REQ_NOIDLE | REQ_PREFLUSH)
> > -#define WRITE_FUA (REQ_NOIDLE | REQ_FUA)
> > -#define WRITE_FLUSH_FUA (REQ_NOIDLE | REQ_PREFLUSH |
> REQ_FUA)
> > +#define WRITE_SYNC REQ_SYNC
> > +#define WRITE_ODIRECT (REQ_SYNC | REQ_IDLE)
> > +#define WRITE_FLUSH REQ_PREFLUSH
> > +#define WRITE_FUA REQ_FUA
> > +#define WRITE_FLUSH_FUA (REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FUA)
> >
> > /*
> > * Attribute flags. These should be or-ed together to figure out what
>
> The above commit changes the meaning of the REQ_SYNC flag, before the
> patch it was equal to WRITE_ODIRECT and after the patch it is equal to
> WRITE_SYNC. And thus I think it became treated differently (I see only
> one place left in wbt_should_throttle.).
>
> But in __swap_writepage() both before and after the mentioned patch we
> still pass a single REQ_SYNC without any REQ_IDLE/REQ_UNIDLE:
>
> > [snorch@snorch linux]$ git blame
> a2b809672ee6fcb4d5756ea815725b3dbaea654e^ mm/page_io.c | grep -a5 REQ_SYNC
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 319)
> unlock_page(page);
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 320)
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 321)
> goto out;
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 322) }
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 323)
> if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
> > ba13e83ec334c (Jens Axboe 2016-08-01 09:38:44 -0600 324)
> bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, REQ_SYNC);
> > ba13e83ec334c (Jens Axboe 2016-08-01 09:38:44 -0600 325)
> else
> > ba13e83ec334c (Jens Axboe 2016-08-01 09:38:44 -0600 326)
> bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0);
> > f8891e5e1f93a (Christoph Lameter 2006-06-30 01:55:45 -0700 327)
> count_vm_event(PSWPOUT);
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 328)
> set_page_writeback(page);
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 329)
> unlock_page(page);
> > [snorch@snorch linux]$ git blame
> a2b809672ee6fcb4d5756ea815725b3dbaea654e mm/page_io.c | grep -a5 REQ_SYNC
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 319)
> unlock_page(page);
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 320)
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 321)
> goto out;
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 322) }
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 323)
> if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
> > ba13e83ec334c (Jens Axboe 2016-08-01 09:38:44 -0600 324)
> bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, REQ_SYNC);
> > ba13e83ec334c (Jens Axboe 2016-08-01 09:38:44 -0600 325)
> else
> > ba13e83ec334c (Jens Axboe 2016-08-01 09:38:44 -0600 326)
> bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0);
> > f8891e5e1f93a (Christoph Lameter 2006-06-30 01:55:45 -0700 327)
> count_vm_event(PSWPOUT);
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 328)
> set_page_writeback(page);
> > ^1da177e4c3f4 (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 329)
> unlock_page(page);
>
> It looks like we've changed the way how we handle swap page writes from
> "odirect" way to "regular" sync write way, these can be wrong. This may
> also affect deprecated cfq io-scheduler on older kernels.
>
> Thanks in advance for any advice on what to do with these, may be I miss
> something.
>

--
Best regards, Tikhomirov Pavel
Software Developer, Virtuozzo.