Re: [PATCH] mtd: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

[Miquel Raynal]

Hi Greg,

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Thu, 7 Nov
2019 09:51:11 +0100:

> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> never do something different based on this.

I didn't know about this. Is this something new or has it been the rule
since the beginning? In the  case, don't we need a Fixes tag here?

> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

> +
> +	d->dfs_emulate_io_failures = debugfs_create_file("tst_emulate_io_failures",
> +							 S_IWUSR, d->dfs_dir,
> +							 (void *)ubi_num,
> +							 &dfs_fops);
> +
> +	d->dfs_emulate_power_cut = debugfs_create_file("tst_emulate_power_cut",
> +						       S_IWUSR, d->dfs_dir,
> +						       (void *)ubi_num,
> +						       &dfs_fops);

Nitpick: I think we miss an empty line here. I can fix it when applying.

> +	d->dfs_power_cut_min = debugfs_create_file("tst_emulate_power_cut_min",
> +						   S_IWUSR, d->dfs_dir,
> +						   (void *)ubi_num, &dfs_fops);
> +
> +	d->dfs_power_cut_max = debugfs_create_file("tst_emulate_power_cut_max",
> +						   S_IWUSR, d->dfs_dir,
> +						   (void *)ubi_num, &dfs_fops);
> +
> +	debugfs_create_file("detailed_erase_block_info", S_IRUSR, d->dfs_dir,
> +			    (void *)ubi_num, &eraseblk_count_fops);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  /**

Thanks,
MiquÃl