Re: [PATCH v7 14/19] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Don't enable already enabled consecutive interrupts

From: Chanwoo Choi
Date: Fri Nov 01 2019 - 02:55:37 EST


On 19. 10. 30. ìì 7:00, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Consecutive up/down interrupt-bit is set in the interrupt status register
> only if that interrupt was previously enabled. Thus enabling the already
> enabled interrupt doesn't do much for us.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> index 9cbee82880ff..a9336cf4b37a 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> @@ -261,8 +261,6 @@ static void actmon_isr_device(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
>
> if (dev->boost_freq >= tegra->max_freq)
> dev->boost_freq = tegra->max_freq;
> - else
> - dev_ctrl |= ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_CONSECUTIVE_ABOVE_WMARK_EN;
> } else if (intr_status & ACTMON_DEV_INTR_CONSECUTIVE_LOWER) {
> /*
> * new_boost = old_boost * down_coef
> @@ -275,8 +273,6 @@ static void actmon_isr_device(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
>
> if (dev->boost_freq < (ACTMON_BOOST_FREQ_STEP >> 1))
> dev->boost_freq = 0;
> - else
> - dev_ctrl |= ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_CONSECUTIVE_BELOW_WMARK_EN;
> }
>
> if (dev->config->avg_dependency_threshold) {
>

Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>

--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics