Re: [PATCH 2/7] rcu: fix tracepoint string when RCU CPU kthread runs

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 10:23:57AM +0000, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> "rcu_wait" is incorrct here, use "rcu_run" instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 278798e58698..c351fc280945 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -2485,7 +2485,7 @@ static void rcu_cpu_kthread(unsigned int cpu)
>  	int spincnt;
>  
>  	for (spincnt = 0; spincnt < 10; spincnt++) {
> -		trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start CPU kthread@rcu_wait"));
> +		trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("Start CPU kthread@rcu_run"));
>  		local_bh_disable();
>  		*statusp = RCU_KTHREAD_RUNNING;
>  		local_irq_disable();
> @@ -2496,7 +2496,7 @@ static void rcu_cpu_kthread(unsigned int cpu)
>  			rcu_core();
>  		local_bh_enable();
>  		if (*workp == 0) {
> -			trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End CPU kthread@rcu_wait"));
> +			trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End CPU kthread@rcu_run"));

This one needs to stay as it was because this is where we wait when out
of work.

So I took the first hunk and dropped this second hunk.

Please let me know if I am missing something.

							Thanx, Paul

>  			*statusp = RCU_KTHREAD_WAITING;
>  			return;
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>