Re: [PATCH] ftpm: add shutdown call back

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:57:21AM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> From: thiruan <thiruan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> add shutdown call back to close existing session with fTPM TA
> to support kexec scenario.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thirupathaiah Annapureddy <thiruan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>

Use the correct tag in the short summary (tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee).

> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.c
> index 6640a14dbe48..c245be6f4015 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ftpm_tee.c
> @@ -328,6 +328,27 @@ static int ftpm_tee_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * ftpm_tee_shutdown - shutdown the TPM device
> + * @pdev: the platform_device description.
> + *
> + * Return:
> + * 	none.

Do not document return values for a void function. The last three lines
do not serve any purpose.

> + */
> +static void ftpm_tee_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct ftpm_tee_private *pvt_data = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> +
> +	/* Free the shared memory pool */
> +	tee_shm_free(pvt_data->shm);

Is it unexpected that calling tee_shm_free() free's a shared memory
pool? A comment here implies exactly that.

> +	/* close the existing session with fTPM TA*/
> +	tee_client_close_session(pvt_data->ctx, pvt_data->session);

Ditto.

> +
> +	/* close the context with TEE driver */
> +	tee_client_close_context(pvt_data->ctx);

Ditto.

> +}
> +
>  static const struct of_device_id of_ftpm_tee_ids[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "microsoft,ftpm" },
>  	{ }
> @@ -341,6 +362,7 @@ static struct platform_driver ftpm_tee_driver = {
>  	},
>  	.probe = ftpm_tee_probe,
>  	.remove = ftpm_tee_remove,
> +	.shutdown = ftpm_tee_shutdown,
>  };
>  
>  module_platform_driver(ftpm_tee_driver);
> -- 
> 2.23.0
> 

/Jarkko