Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] x86/kvm: Change print code to use pr_*() format

From: Zhenzhong Duan
Date: Sun Oct 13 2019 - 21:40:32 EST



On 2019/10/13 17:06, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

pr_*() is preferred than printk(KERN_* ...), after change all the print
in arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c will have "kvm_guest: xxx" style.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
index 3bc6a266..ef836d6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
* Authors: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>
*/
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "kvm_guest: " fmt
+
#include <linux/context_tracking.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -286,8 +288,8 @@ static void kvm_register_steal_time(void)
return;
wrmsrl(MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME, (slow_virt_to_phys(st) | KVM_MSR_ENABLED));
- pr_info("kvm-stealtime: cpu %d, msr %llx\n",
- cpu, (unsigned long long) slow_virt_to_phys(st));
+ pr_info("stealtime: cpu %d, msr %llx\n", cpu,
+ (unsigned long long) slow_virt_to_phys(st));
}
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_DECRYPTED(unsigned long, kvm_apic_eoi) = KVM_PV_EOI_DISABLED;
@@ -321,8 +323,7 @@ static void kvm_guest_cpu_init(void)
wrmsrl(MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN, pa);
__this_cpu_write(apf_reason.enabled, 1);
- printk(KERN_INFO"KVM setup async PF for cpu %d\n",
- smp_processor_id());
+ pr_info("setup async PF for cpu %d\n", smp_processor_id());
}
if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI)) {
@@ -347,8 +348,7 @@ static void kvm_pv_disable_apf(void)
wrmsrl(MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN, 0);
__this_cpu_write(apf_reason.enabled, 0);
- printk(KERN_INFO"Unregister pv shared memory for cpu %d\n",
- smp_processor_id());
+ pr_info("Unregister pv shared memory for cpu %d\n", smp_processor_id());
}
static void kvm_pv_guest_cpu_reboot(void *unused)
@@ -469,7 +469,8 @@ static void __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
} else {
ret = kvm_hypercall4(KVM_HC_SEND_IPI, (unsigned long)ipi_bitmap,
(unsigned long)(ipi_bitmap >> BITS_PER_LONG), min, icr);
- WARN_ONCE(ret < 0, "KVM: failed to send PV IPI: %ld", ret);
+ WARN_ONCE(ret < 0, "kvm_guest: failed to send PV IPI: %ld",
+ ret);
min = max = apic_id;
ipi_bitmap = 0;
}
@@ -479,7 +480,8 @@ static void __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
if (ipi_bitmap) {
ret = kvm_hypercall4(KVM_HC_SEND_IPI, (unsigned long)ipi_bitmap,
(unsigned long)(ipi_bitmap >> BITS_PER_LONG), min, icr);
- WARN_ONCE(ret < 0, "KVM: failed to send PV IPI: %ld", ret);
+ WARN_ONCE(ret < 0, "kvm_guest: failed to send PV IPI: %ld",
+ ret);
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -509,7 +511,7 @@ static void kvm_setup_pv_ipi(void)
{
apic->send_IPI_mask = kvm_send_ipi_mask;
apic->send_IPI_mask_allbutself = kvm_send_ipi_mask_allbutself;
- pr_info("KVM setup pv IPIs\n");
+ pr_info("setup pv IPIs\n");
Not your fault but in WARN_ONCE() above we use 'PV' capitalized so I'd
suggest we converge on something: either capitalize them all or make
them all lowercase.

Thanks for catching, will do with 'PV' for all print.

Zhenzhong