Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] KVM: VMX: Optimize vmx_set_rflags() for unrestricted guest

[Sean Christopherson]

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:59:10PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/10/19 18:38, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:40:53PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 27/09/19 23:45, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >>> Rework vmx_set_rflags() to avoid the extra code need to handle emulation
> >>> of real mode and invalid state when unrestricted guest is disabled.  The
> >>> primary reason for doing so is to avoid the call to vmx_get_rflags(),
> >>> which will incur a VMREAD when RFLAGS is not already available.  When
> >>> running nested VMs, the majority of calls to vmx_set_rflags() will occur
> >>> without an associated vmx_get_rflags(), i.e. when stuffing GUEST_RFLAGS
> >>> during transitions between vmcs01 and vmcs02.
> >>>
> >>> Note, vmx_get_rflags() guarantees RFLAGS is marked available.
> >>
> >> Slightly nicer this way:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> >> index 8de9853d7ab6..62ab19d65efd 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> >> @@ -1431,9 +1431,17 @@ unsigned long vmx_get_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >>  void vmx_set_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> >> -	unsigned long old_rflags = vmx_get_rflags(vcpu);
> >> +	unsigned long old_rflags;
> >> +
> >> +	if (enable_unrestricted_guest) {
> >> +		__set_bit(VCPU_EXREG_RFLAGS, (ulong *)&vcpu->arch.regs_avail);
> >> +		vmx->rflags = rflags;
> >> +		vmcs_writel(GUEST_RFLAGS, rflags);
> >> +		return;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	old_rflags = vmx_get_rflags(vcpu);
> >>  
> >> -	__set_bit(VCPU_EXREG_RFLAGS, (ulong *)&vcpu->arch.regs_avail);
> >>  	vmx->rflags = rflags;
> >>  	if (vmx->rmode.vm86_active) {
> >>  		vmx->rmode.save_rflags = rflags;
> > 
> > Works for me.  Do you want me to spin a v3 to incorporate this and remove
> > the open coding of the RIP/RSP accessors?  Or are you planning on squashing
> > the changes as you apply?
> 
> If it's okay for you I can squash it.

Squash away.