Re: [PATCH v2] x86/kdump: Fix 'kmem -s' reported an invalid freepointer when SME was active

From: Dave Young
Date: Mon Oct 07 2019 - 05:33:50 EST


Hi Lianbo,
On 10/07/19 at 03:08pm, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204793
>
> Kdump kernel will reuse the first 640k region because of some reasons,
> for example: the trampline and conventional PC system BIOS region may
> require to allocate memory in this area. Obviously, kdump kernel will
> also overwrite the first 640k region, therefore, kernel has to copy
> the contents of the first 640k area to a backup area, which is done in
> purgatory(), because vmcore may need the old memory. When vmcore is
> dumped, kdump kernel will read the old memory from the backup area of
> the first 640k area.
>
> Basically, the main reason should be clear, kernel does not correctly
> handle the first 640k region when SME is active, which causes that
> kernel does not properly copy these old memory to the backup area in
> purgatory(). Therefore, kdump kernel reads out the incorrect contents
> from the backup area when dumping vmcore. Finally, the phenomenon is
> as follow:
>
> [root linux]$ crash vmlinux /var/crash/127.0.0.1-2019-09-19-08\:31\:27/vmcore
> WARNING: kernel relocated [240MB]: patching 97110 gdb minimal_symbol values
>
> KERNEL: /var/crash/127.0.0.1-2019-09-19-08:31:27/vmlinux
> DUMPFILE: /var/crash/127.0.0.1-2019-09-19-08:31:27/vmcore [PARTIAL DUMP]
> CPUS: 128
> DATE: Thu Sep 19 08:31:18 2019
> UPTIME: 00:01:21
> LOAD AVERAGE: 0.16, 0.07, 0.02
> TASKS: 1343
> NODENAME: amd-ethanol
> RELEASE: 5.3.0-rc7+
> VERSION: #4 SMP Thu Sep 19 08:14:00 EDT 2019
> MACHINE: x86_64 (2195 Mhz)
> MEMORY: 127.9 GB
> PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: sysrq triggered crash"
> PID: 9789
> COMMAND: "bash"
> TASK: "ffff89711894ae80 [THREAD_INFO: ffff89711894ae80]"
> CPU: 83
> STATE: TASK_RUNNING (PANIC)
>
> crash> kmem -s|grep -i invalid
> kmem: dma-kmalloc-512: slab:ffffd77680001c00 invalid freepointer:a6086ac099f0c5a4
> kmem: dma-kmalloc-512: slab:ffffd77680001c00 invalid freepointer:a6086ac099f0c5a4
> crash>
>
> BTW: I also tried to fix the above problem in purgatory(), but there
> are too many restricts in purgatory() context, for example: i can't
> allocate new memory to create the identity mapping page table for SME
> situation.
>
> Currently, there are two places where the first 640k area is needed,
> the first one is in the find_trampoline_placement(), another one is
> in the reserve_real_mode(), and their content doesn't matter. To avoid
> the above error, lets occupy the remain memory of the first 640k region
> (expect for the trampoline and real mode) so that the allocated memory
> does not fall into the first 640k area when SME is active, which makes
> us not to worry about whether kernel can correctly copy the contents of
> the first 640k area to a backup region in the purgatory().
>
> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Improve patch log
> 2. Change the checking condition from sme_active() to sme_active()
> && strstr(boot_command_line, "crashkernel=")
>
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index 77ea96b794bd..bdb1a02a84fd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1148,6 +1148,9 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>
> reserve_real_mode();
>
> + if (sme_active() && strstr(boot_command_line, "crashkernel="))
> + memblock_reserve(0, 640*1024);
> +

Seems you missed the comment about "unconditionally do it", only check
crashkernel param looks better.

Also I noticed reserve_crashkernel is called after initmem_init, I'm not
sure if memblock_reserve is good enough in early code before
initmem_init.

> trim_platform_memory_ranges();
> trim_low_memory_range();
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Thanks
Dave