Re: [v2 0/3] Fix issues reported by Coccinelle

[Markus Elfring]

>> * I would prefer to refer to a desired reduction of a few
>>   source code quality concerns.
>
> Not needed. I understand what is going on here.

I suggest to reconsider the interpretation of âensuranceâ
after only a few source code places were adjusted.


>>> Changes in â
>>
>> Can such a prefix be omitted?
>
> Why? I think it makes sense?

Can the specification of a version identifier be occasionally
sufficient already?

Regards,
Markus