RE: [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table

From: Xiaowei Bao
Date: Sat Sep 14 2019 - 00:13:51 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2019å9æ12æ 21:00
> To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@xxxxxxx>; helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; Leo
> Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; kishon@xxxxxx; lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx; M.h.
> Lian <minghuan.lian@xxxxxxx>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@xxxxxxx>; Roy
> Zang <roy.zang@xxxxxxx>; jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx;
> gustavo.pimentel@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> arnd@xxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Z.q. Hou
> <zhiqiang.hou@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a in
> pci_device_id table
>
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 01:52:30AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: 2019å9æ2æ 20:55
> > > To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; kishon@xxxxxx; lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx;
> M.h.
> > > Lian <minghuan.lian@xxxxxxx>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@xxxxxxx>; Roy
> > > Zang <roy.zang@xxxxxxx>; jingoohan1@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > gustavo.pimentel@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > arnd@xxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Z.q. Hou
> > > <zhiqiang.hou@xxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a
> > > in pci_device_id table
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:17:16AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> > > > Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table so that pci-epf-test can be
> > > > used for testing PCIe EP in LS1088a.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > v2:
> > > > - No change.
> > > > v3:
> > > > - No change.
> > > >
> > > > drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c | 1 +
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > > > b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > > > index 6e208a0..d531951 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/misc/pci_endpoint_test.c
> > > > @@ -793,6 +793,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id
> > > pci_endpoint_test_tbl[] = {
> > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA74x) },
> > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_DRA72x) },
> > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x81c0) },
> > > > + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_FREESCALE, 0x80c0) },
> > >
> > > The Freescale PCI devices are the only devices in this table that
> > > don't have a define for their device ID. I think a define should be
> > > created for both of the device IDs above.
> >
> > OK, but I only define in this file, I am not sure this can define in
> > include/linux/pci_ids.h file
>
> This file seems a little inconsistent...
>
> - Two of the TI device IDs are defined in pci_ids.h and only used in
> pci_endpoint_test.c
> - One of the TI device IDs are defined in pci_endpoint_test.c and only used
> there
> - The Freescale device ID is hardcoded and only used in pci_endpoint_test.c
>
> The header in pci_ids.h has a comment suggestion definitions are only added
> where used in multiple files - yet I don't think this holds true.

Thanks Andrew.


>
> Bjorn - do you have a suggestion?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Murray
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > Xiaowei
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Andrew Murray
> > >
> > > > { PCI_DEVICE_DATA(SYNOPSYS, EDDA, NULL) },
> > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_TI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TI_AM654),
> > > > .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&am654_data
> > > > --
> > > > 2.9.5
> > > >