Re: [PATCH 0/7] Rework random blocking

[Pavel Machek]

On Thu 2019-08-29 18:11:35, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This makes two major semantic changes to Linux's random APIs:
> 
> It adds getentropy(..., GRND_INSECURE).  This causes getentropy to
> always return *something*.  There is no guarantee whatsoever that
> the result will be cryptographically random or even unique, but the
> kernel will give the best quality random output it can.  The name is
> a big hint: the resulting output is INSECURE.
> 
> The purpose of this is to allow programs that genuinely want
> best-effort entropy to get it without resorting to /dev/urandom.
> Plenty of programs do this because they need to do *something*
> during boot and they can't afford to wait.  Calling it "INSECURE" is
> probably the best we can do to discourage using this API for things
> that need security.
> 
> This series also removes the blocking pool and makes /dev/random
> work just like getentropy(..., 0) and makes GRND_RANDOM a no-op.  I
> believe that Linux's blocking pool has outlived its usefulness.
> Linux's CRNG generates output that is good enough to use even for
> key generation.  The blocking pool is not stronger in any material
> way, and keeping it around requires a lot of infrastructure of
> dubious value.

Could you give some more justification? If crng is good enough for
you, you can use /dev/urandom...


are 

> This series should not break any existing programs.  /dev/urandom is
> unchanged.  /dev/random will still block just after booting, but it
> will block less than it used to.  getentropy() with existing flags
> will return output that is, for practical purposes, just as strong
> as before.

So what is the exact semantic of /dev/random after your change?
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature