Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/78] 4.4.190-stable review

From: Kevin Hilman
Date: Fri Aug 23 2019 - 12:05:53 EST


Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 04:10, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> "kernelci.org bot" <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > stable-rc/linux-4.4.y boot: 101 boots: 2 failed, 84 passed with 12 offline, 2 untried/unknown, 1 conflict (v4.4.189-79-gf18b2d12bf91)
>>
>> TL;DR; All is well.
>>
>> > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.4.y/kernel/v4.4.189-79-gf18b2d12bf91/
>> > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.4.y/kernel/v4.4.189-79-gf18b2d12bf91/
>> >
>> > Tree: stable-rc
>> > Branch: linux-4.4.y
>> > Git Describe: v4.4.189-79-gf18b2d12bf91
>> > Git Commit: f18b2d12bf9162bef0b051e6300b389a674f68e1
>> > Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>> > Tested: 47 unique boards, 19 SoC families, 14 builds out of 190
> ...
>> > Boot Failures Detected:
>> >
>> > arm64:
>> > defconfig:
>> > gcc-8:
>> > qcom-qdf2400: 1 failed lab
>>
>> This one looks like the boot firmware is not even starting the kernel.
>> The Linaro/LKFT lab folks will need to have a look.
>
> At LKFT lab arm64 juno-r2 is only the device for 4.4 upstream kernel testing.

That might be your goal, but that's not what is happening.

This boards is clearly being tested with v4.4 in kernelCI:
https://kernelci.org/boot/qcom-qdf2400/

Looks like you may want to blacklist v4.4 for this board in kernelCI.

Kevin