[PATCH] selftests: kvm: fix state save/load on processors without XSAVE

From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Tue Aug 20 2019 - 11:36:31 EST


state_test and smm_test are failing on older processors that do not
have xcr0. This is because on those processor KVM does provide
support for KVM_GET/SET_XSAVE (to avoid having to rely on the older
KVM_GET/SET_FPU) but not for KVM_GET/SET_XCRS.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 16 ++++++++++------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
index 6cb34a0fa200..0a5e487dbc50 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
@@ -1060,9 +1060,11 @@ struct kvm_x86_state *vcpu_save_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid)
TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XSAVE, r: %i",
r);

- r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XCRS, &state->xcrs);
- TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XCRS, r: %i",
- r);
+ if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS)) {
+ r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XCRS, &state->xcrs);
+ TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XCRS, r: %i",
+ r);
+ }

r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_SREGS, &state->sregs);
TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_SREGS, r: %i",
@@ -1103,9 +1105,11 @@ void vcpu_load_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_x86_state *s
TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XSAVE, r: %i",
r);

- r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_XCRS, &state->xcrs);
- TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XCRS, r: %i",
- r);
+ if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS)) {
+ r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_XCRS, &state->xcrs);
+ TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XCRS, r: %i",
+ r);
+ }

r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_SREGS, &state->sregs);
TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_SREGS, r: %i",
--
1.8.3.1