Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] tracing: Document the stack trace algorithm in the comments

From: Joel Fernandes
Date: Thu Aug 08 2019 - 16:17:06 EST


On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 01:28:28PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> As the max stack tracer algorithm is not that easy to understand from the
> code, add comments that explain the algorithm and mentions how
> ARCH_RET_ADDR_AFTER_LOCAL_VARS affects it.
>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190806123455.487ac02b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>

Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

thanks!!

- Joel


> Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_stack.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> index 40e4a88eea8f..f94a2fc567de 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,104 @@ static void print_max_stack(void)
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * The stack tracer looks for a maximum stack at each call from a function. It
> + * registers a callback from ftrace, and in that callback it examines the stack
> + * size. It determines the stack size from the variable passed in, which is the
> + * address of a local variable in the stack_trace_call() callback function.
> + * The stack size is calculated by the address of the local variable to the top
> + * of the current stack. If that size is smaller than the currently saved max
> + * stack size, nothing more is done.
> + *
> + * If the size of the stack is greater than the maximum recorded size, then the
> + * following algorithm takes place.
> + *
> + * For architectures (like x86) that store the function's return address before
> + * saving the function's local variables, the stack will look something like
> + * this:
> + *
> + * [ top of stack ]
> + * 0: sys call entry frame
> + * 10: return addr to entry code
> + * 11: start of sys_foo frame
> + * 20: return addr to sys_foo
> + * 21: start of kernel_func_bar frame
> + * 30: return addr to kernel_func_bar
> + * 31: [ do trace stack here ]
> + *
> + * The save_stack_trace() is called returning all the functions it finds in the
> + * current stack. Which would be (from the bottom of the stack to the top):
> + *
> + * return addr to kernel_func_bar
> + * return addr to sys_foo
> + * return addr to entry code
> + *
> + * Now to figure out how much each of these functions' local variable size is,
> + * a search of the stack is made to find these values. When a match is made, it
> + * is added to the stack_dump_trace[] array. The offset into the stack is saved
> + * in the stack_trace_index[] array. The above example would show:
> + *
> + * stack_dump_trace[] | stack_trace_index[]
> + * ------------------ + -------------------
> + * return addr to kernel_func_bar | 30
> + * return addr to sys_foo | 20
> + * return addr to entry | 10
> + *
> + * The print_max_stack() function above, uses these values to print the size of
> + * each function's portion of the stack.
> + *
> + * for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++) {
> + * size = i == nr_entries - 1 ? stack_trace_index[i] :
> + * stack_trace_index[i] - stack_trace_index[i+1]
> + * print "%d %d %d %s\n", i, stack_trace_index[i], size, stack_dump_trace[i]);
> + * }
> + *
> + * The above shows
> + *
> + * depth size location
> + * ----- ---- --------
> + * 0 30 10 kernel_func_bar
> + * 1 20 10 sys_foo
> + * 2 10 10 entry code
> + *
> + * Now for architectures that might save the return address after the functions
> + * local variables (saving the link register before calling nested functions),
> + * this will cause the stack to look a little different:
> + *
> + * [ top of stack ]
> + * 0: sys call entry frame
> + * 10: start of sys_foo_frame
> + * 19: return addr to entry code << lr saved before calling kernel_func_bar
> + * 20: start of kernel_func_bar frame
> + * 29: return addr to sys_foo_frame << lr saved before calling next function
> + * 30: [ do trace stack here ]
> + *
> + * Although the functions returned by save_stack_trace() may be the same, the
> + * placement in the stack will be different. Using the same algorithm as above
> + * would yield:
> + *
> + * stack_dump_trace[] | stack_trace_index[]
> + * ------------------ + -------------------
> + * return addr to kernel_func_bar | 30
> + * return addr to sys_foo | 29
> + * return addr to entry | 19
> + *
> + * Where the mapping is off by one:
> + *
> + * kernel_func_bar stack frame size is 29 - 19 not 30 - 29!
> + *
> + * To fix this, if the architecture sets ARCH_RET_ADDR_AFTER_LOCAL_VARS the
> + * values in stack_trace_index[] are shifted by one to and the number of
> + * stack trace entries is decremented by one.
> + *
> + * stack_dump_trace[] | stack_trace_index[]
> + * ------------------ + -------------------
> + * return addr to kernel_func_bar | 29
> + * return addr to sys_foo | 19
> + *
> + * Although the entry function is not displayed, the first function (sys_foo)
> + * will still include the stack size of it.
> + */
> static void check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned long *stack)
> {
> unsigned long this_size, flags; unsigned long *p, *top, *start;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>