RE: [PATCH V3 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: imx7: Add support for i.MX8MM

[Anson Huang]

Hi, Philipp

> On Fri, 2019-07-05 at 00:26 +0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> > Hi, Philipp
> >
> > > On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 17:44 +0800, Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > i.MX8MM can reuse i.MX8MQ's reset driver, update the compatible
> > > > property and related info to support i.MX8MM.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes since V2:
> > > > 	- Add separate line for i.MX8MM in case anything different later
> > > > for
> > >
> > > i.MX8MM.
> > > > ---
> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx7-src.txt | 6
> > > > ++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx7-src.txt
> > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx7-src.txt
> > > > index 13e0951..c2489e4 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx7-src.txt
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/fsl,imx7-src.txt
> > > > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Required properties:
> > > >  - compatible:
> > > >  	- For i.MX7 SoCs should be "fsl,imx7d-src", "syscon"
> > > >  	- For i.MX8MQ SoCs should be "fsl,imx8mq-src", "syscon"
> > > > +	- For i.MX8MM SoCs should be "fsl,imx8mm-src", "fsl,imx8mq-src",
> > >
> > > "syscon"
> > > >  - reg: should be register base and length as documented in the
> > > >    datasheet
> > > >  - interrupts: Should contain SRC interrupt @@ -46,5 +47,6 @@ Example:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  For list of all valid reset indices see
> > > > -<dt-bindings/reset/imx7-reset.h> for i.MX7 and
> > > > -<dt-bindings/reset/imx8mq-reset.h> for i.MX8MQ
> > > > +<dt-bindings/reset/imx7-reset.h> for i.MX7,
> > > > +<dt-bindings/reset/imx8mq-reset.h> for i.MX8MQ and
> > > > +<dt-bindings/reset/imx8mq-reset.h> for i.MX8MM
> > >
> > > The last line is misleading, as that file contains reset indices
> > > that are invalid for i.MX8MM.
> >
> > What is your suggestion about this line?
> 
> I would prefer to add an imx8mm-reset.h with only the existing reset bits,
> using the IMX8MM_RESET_ prefix.ÂThat would make it easy to spot errors in
> the dtsi (anything starting with IMX8MQ_ is potentially wrong).
> 
> > Just NOT change it?
> 
> The change is good in principle. It just should point to an imx8mm- reset.h with
> only the existing resets on i.MX8MM, or imx8mq-reset.h should be modified to
> actually make clear which resets are valid on i.MX8MM.
> 
> > Or adding a new fileÂimx8mm-reset.h but still use the IMX8MQ_RESET_ as
> > prefix ?
> 
> I don't think you should redefine the same macros in imx8mm-reset.h. In this
> case using IMX8MM_RESET_ would be better.
> 
> > Or keep what I changed, but adding some comments in those macros that
> > i.MX8MM does NOT support?
> 
> That would be acceptable as well.

I will go this way, thanks for suggestion.

Anson.

> 
> regards
> Philipp