Re: [PATCH 0/6] workqueue: convert to raw_spinlock_t

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:12:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> We are working hard to get the remaining pieces in and to the best of my
> knowledge there is no hard resistance against merging them.

I wonder whether it'd be useful to build some consensus around the
approach.  It'd be a lot easier for everyone involved than having the
same conversation repeatedly.  What do you think?

> What we are trying at the moment is to reduce the surface of the bulk of RT
> changes and get the 'innocent' ones in. If you feel more comfortable, then
> we can surely redo the series and pick 1,2,6 for now and keep 3-5 for the
> final submission.

Yeah, that sounds good.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun