RE: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too

[Steve Twiss]

On 20 June 2019 13:29, Lee Jones wrote:

> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too
> 
> Why isn't this reply attached (threaded) to the patch.

My apologies. It wasn't my intention to split Wolfram's original e-mail thread.

I don't usually reply using the mailto: link from lore when creating e-mails.
Outlook mustn't support the In-Reply-To header.

I'll figure out a different way to reply in future.

> Is your mailer broken?

It's Windows