Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers: media: i2c: fix warning same module names

[Hans Verkuil]

On 6/12/19 10:12 AM, Anders Roxell wrote:
> When building with CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7511 and CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511
> enabled as loadable modules, we see the following warning:
> 
> warning: same module names found:
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511.ko
>   drivers/media/i2c/adv7511.ko
> 
> Rework so the names matches the config fragment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/Makefile | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile b/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
> index d8ad9dad495d..b71a427a89fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
> @@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV748X) += adv748x/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7604) += adv7604.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7842) += adv7842.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_AD9389B) += ad9389b.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7511) += adv7511.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7511) += video-adv7511.o
> +video-adv7511-objs          := adv7511.o

I prefer adv7511-v4l2 as the new name. 'video' is too vague and can easily be
confused with drivers/video.

I think it is better to rename adv7511.c to adv7511-v4l2.c and add a comment
at the top of that source explaining why it is named like that.

Regards,

	Hans

>  obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_VPX3220) += vpx3220.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_VS6624)  += vs6624.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_BT819) += bt819.o
>