[PATCH 4.19 20/51] NFSv4.1: Again fix a race where CB_NOTIFY_LOCK fails to wake a waiter

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sun Jun 09 2019 - 12:52:19 EST


From: Yihao Wu <wuyihao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 52b042ab9948cc367b61f9ca9c18603aa7813c3a upstream.

Commit b7dbcc0e433f "NFSv4.1: Fix a race where CB_NOTIFY_LOCK fails to wake a waiter"
found this bug. However it didn't fix it.

This commit replaces schedule_timeout() with wait_woken() and
default_wake_function() with woken_wake_function() in function
nfs4_retry_setlk() and nfs4_wake_lock_waiter(). wait_woken() uses
memory barriers in its implementation to avoid potential race condition
when putting a process into sleeping state and then waking it up.

Fixes: a1d617d8f134 ("nfs: allow blocking locks to be awoken by lock callbacks")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx #4.9+
Signed-off-by: Yihao Wu <wuyihao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -6850,7 +6850,6 @@ struct nfs4_lock_waiter {
struct task_struct *task;
struct inode *inode;
struct nfs_lowner *owner;
- bool notified;
};

static int
@@ -6872,13 +6871,13 @@ nfs4_wake_lock_waiter(wait_queue_entry_t
/* Make sure it's for the right inode */
if (nfs_compare_fh(NFS_FH(waiter->inode), &cbnl->cbnl_fh))
return 0;
-
- waiter->notified = true;
}

/* override "private" so we can use default_wake_function */
wait->private = waiter->task;
- ret = autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, flags, key);
+ ret = woken_wake_function(wait, mode, flags, key);
+ if (ret)
+ list_del_init(&wait->entry);
wait->private = waiter;
return ret;
}
@@ -6887,7 +6886,6 @@ static int
nfs4_retry_setlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
{
int status = -ERESTARTSYS;
- unsigned long flags;
struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp = request->fl_u.nfs4_fl.owner;
struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(state->inode);
struct nfs_client *clp = server->nfs_client;
@@ -6897,8 +6895,7 @@ nfs4_retry_setlk(struct nfs4_state *stat
.s_dev = server->s_dev };
struct nfs4_lock_waiter waiter = { .task = current,
.inode = state->inode,
- .owner = &owner,
- .notified = false };
+ .owner = &owner};
wait_queue_entry_t wait;

/* Don't bother with waitqueue if we don't expect a callback */
@@ -6911,21 +6908,14 @@ nfs4_retry_setlk(struct nfs4_state *stat
add_wait_queue(q, &wait);

while(!signalled()) {
- waiter.notified = false;
status = nfs4_proc_setlk(state, cmd, request);
if ((status != -EAGAIN) || IS_SETLK(cmd))
break;

status = -ERESTARTSYS;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
- if (waiter.notified) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
- continue;
- }
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
-
- freezable_schedule_timeout(NFS4_LOCK_MAXTIMEOUT);
+ freezer_do_not_count();
+ wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, NFS4_LOCK_MAXTIMEOUT);
+ freezer_count();
}

finish_wait(q, &wait);