Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/6] Perf uncore support for Snow Ridge server

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 05:53:42PM -0700, kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The patch series intends to enable perf uncore support for Snow Ridge
> server.
> 
> Here is the link for the uncore document.
> https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/611319
> 
> Patch 1: Fixes a generic issue for uncore free-running counter, which
> also impacts the Snow Ridge server.
> 
> Patch 2-6: Perf uncore support for Snow Ridge server.
> 
> Kan Liang (6):
>   perf/x86/intel/uncore: Handle invalid event coding for free-running
>     counter
>   perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add uncore support for Snow Ridge server
>   perf/x86/intel/uncore: Extract codes of box ref/unref
>   perf/x86/intel/uncore: Support MMIO type uncore blocks
>   perf/x86/intel/uncore: Clean up client IMC
>   perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add IMC uncore support for Snow Ridge
> 
>  arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c       | 122 +++++--
>  arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h       |  41 ++-
>  arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c   |  16 +-
>  arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 601 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 737 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

Kan, we had horrible conflicts between this set and the topology
s/pkg/die/ thing. I've attempted a rebase here:

  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/log/?h=perf/core

can you please double check?