Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] sched/dl: Capacity-aware migrations

From: luca abeni
Date: Tue May 07 2019 - 10:42:29 EST


Hi,

On Tue, 7 May 2019 15:10:50 +0100
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Monday 06 May 2019 at 06:48:32 (+0200), Luca Abeni wrote:
> > static inline unsigned long cpu_bw_dl(struct rq *rq)
> > {
> > - return (rq->dl.running_bw * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) >>
> > BW_SHIFT;
> > + unsigned long res;
> > +
> > + res = (rq->dl.running_bw * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) >>
> > BW_SHIFT; +
> > + return (res << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT) /
> > + arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, rq->cpu);
>
> The only user of cpu_bw_dl() is schedutil right ? If yes, we probably
> don't want to scale things here -- schedutil already does this I
> believe.

I think I added this modification because I arrived to the conclusion
that schedutils does not perform this rescaling (at least, I think it
did not perform it when I wrote the patch :)


BTW, while re-reading the patch I do not understand why this change was
added in this specific patch... I suspect it should have gone in a
separate patch.



Luca

>
> Thanks,
> Quentin
>
> > }
> >
> > static inline unsigned long cpu_util_dl(struct rq *rq)
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >