Re: [PATCH V3 07/12] misc: xilinx_sdfec: Add ability to configure LDPC

From: Greg KH
Date: Sat May 04 2019 - 05:01:17 EST


On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 04:49:19PM +0000, Dragan Cvetic wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Please find inline comments below.

As they should be, no need to mention it :)

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday 2 May 2019 18:27
> > To: Dragan Cvetic <draganc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: arnd@xxxxxxxx; Michal Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Derek Kiernan <dkiernan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 07/12] misc: xilinx_sdfec: Add ability to configure LDPC
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 11:05:01PM +0100, Dragan Cvetic wrote:
> > > --- a/include/uapi/misc/xilinx_sdfec.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/misc/xilinx_sdfec.h
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > +/**
> > > + * xsdfec_calculate_shared_ldpc_table_entry_size - Calculates shared code
> > > + * table sizes.
> > > + * @ldpc: Pointer to the LPDC Code Parameters
> > > + * @table_sizes: Pointer to structure containing the calculated table sizes
> > > + *
> > > + * Calculates the size of shared LDPC code tables used for a specified LPDC code
> > > + * parameters.
> > > + */
> > > +inline void
> > > +xsdfec_calculate_shared_ldpc_table_entry_size(struct xsdfec_ldpc_params *ldpc,
> > > + struct xsdfec_ldpc_param_table_sizes *table_sizes)
> > > +{
> > > + /* Calculate the sc_size in 32 bit words */
> > > + table_sizes->sc_size = (ldpc->nlayers + 3) >> 2;
> > > + /* Calculate the la_size in 256 bit words */
> > > + table_sizes->la_size = ((ldpc->nlayers << 2) + 15) >> 4;
> > > + /* Calculate the qc_size in 256 bit words */
> > > + table_sizes->qc_size = ((ldpc->nqc << 2) + 15) >> 4;
> > > +}
> >
> > Why do you have an inline function in a user api .h file? That's really
> > not a good idea.
>
> This is just a Helper function for users aligning the calculations.
> Please advise, is this acceptable?

Not really, just have actual api functions in a uapi .h file, why would
userspace care about this type of thing?

thanks,

greg k-h