Re: [PATCH v3 12/16] PM / devfreq: tegra: Reconfigure hardware on governor's restart

From: Chanwoo Choi
Date: Mon Apr 29 2019 - 21:18:19 EST


Hi,

On 19. 4. 18. ìì 7:29, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Move hardware configuration to governor's start/resume methods.
> This allows to re-initialize hardware counters and reconfigure
> cleanly if governor was stopped/paused. That is needed because we
> are not aware of all hardware changes that happened while governor
> was stopped and the paused state may get out of sync with reality,
> hence it's better to start with a clean slate after the pause. In
> a result there is no memory bandwidth starvation after resume from
> suspend-to-ram that results in display controller underflowing that
> happens on resume because of improper decision made by devfreq about
> the required memory frequency. This change also cleans up code a tad
> by moving hardware-configuration code into a single location.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c | 98 ++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
> index 62f35e818122..e9ab49394d35 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c
> @@ -392,55 +392,6 @@ static int tegra_actmon_rate_notify_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> }
>
> -static void tegra_actmon_enable_interrupts(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra)
> -{
> - struct tegra_devfreq_device *dev;
> - u32 val;
> - unsigned int i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra->devices); i++) {
> - dev = &tegra->devices[i];
> -
> - val = device_readl(dev, ACTMON_DEV_CTRL);
> - val |= ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_AVG_ABOVE_WMARK_EN;
> - val |= ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_AVG_BELOW_WMARK_EN;
> - val |= ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_CONSECUTIVE_BELOW_WMARK_EN;
> - val |= ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_CONSECUTIVE_ABOVE_WMARK_EN;
> -
> - device_writel(dev, val, ACTMON_DEV_CTRL);
> - }
> -
> - actmon_write_barrier(tegra);
> -}
> -
> -static void tegra_actmon_disable_interrupts(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra)
> -{
> - struct tegra_devfreq_device *dev;
> - u32 val;
> - unsigned int i;
> -
> - disable_irq(tegra->irq);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra->devices); i++) {
> - dev = &tegra->devices[i];
> -
> - val = device_readl(dev, ACTMON_DEV_CTRL);
> - val &= ~ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_AVG_ABOVE_WMARK_EN;
> - val &= ~ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_AVG_BELOW_WMARK_EN;
> - val &= ~ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_CONSECUTIVE_BELOW_WMARK_EN;
> - val &= ~ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_CONSECUTIVE_ABOVE_WMARK_EN;
> -
> - device_writel(dev, val, ACTMON_DEV_CTRL);
> -
> - device_writel(dev, ACTMON_INTR_STATUS_CLEAR,
> - ACTMON_DEV_INTR_STATUS);
> - }
> -
> - actmon_write_barrier(tegra);
> -
> - enable_irq(tegra->irq);
> -}
> -
> static void tegra_actmon_configure_device(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
> struct tegra_devfreq_device *dev)
> {
> @@ -464,11 +415,47 @@ static void tegra_actmon_configure_device(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
> << ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_CONSECUTIVE_BELOW_WMARK_NUM_SHIFT;
> val |= (ACTMON_ABOVE_WMARK_WINDOW - 1)
> << ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_CONSECUTIVE_ABOVE_WMARK_NUM_SHIFT;
> + val |= ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_AVG_ABOVE_WMARK_EN;
> + val |= ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_AVG_BELOW_WMARK_EN;
> + val |= ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_CONSECUTIVE_BELOW_WMARK_EN;
> + val |= ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_CONSECUTIVE_ABOVE_WMARK_EN;
> val |= ACTMON_DEV_CTRL_ENB;
>
> device_writel(dev, val, ACTMON_DEV_CTRL);
> +}
> +
> +static void tegra_actmon_start(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + disable_irq(tegra->irq);
> +
> + actmon_writel(tegra, ACTMON_SAMPLING_PERIOD - 1,
> + ACTMON_GLB_PERIOD_CTRL);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra->devices); i++)
> + tegra_actmon_configure_device(tegra, &tegra->devices[i]);

nitpick.
I agree this patch.

In order to make it more simple, I think that you can remove
tegra_actmon_configure() function and then just do some opertion
under the for loop in the tegra_actmon_start() to keep
similar style with tegra_actmon_stop(). But there is perfect solution.
If you agree, edit it on next patch. If you think that it is not necessary,
just keep this code.

> +
> + actmon_write_barrier(tegra);
> +
> + enable_irq(tegra->irq);
> +}
> +
> +static void tegra_actmon_stop(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + disable_irq(tegra->irq);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra->devices); i++) {
> + device_writel(&tegra->devices[i], 0x00000000, ACTMON_DEV_CTRL);
> + device_writel(&tegra->devices[i], ACTMON_INTR_STATUS_CLEAR,
> + ACTMON_DEV_INTR_STATUS);
> + }
>
> actmon_write_barrier(tegra);
> +
> + enable_irq(tegra->irq);
> }
>
> static int tegra_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
> @@ -580,22 +567,22 @@ static int tegra_governor_event_handler(struct devfreq *devfreq,
> switch (event) {
> case DEVFREQ_GOV_START:
> devfreq_monitor_start(devfreq);
> - tegra_actmon_enable_interrupts(tegra);
> + tegra_actmon_start(tegra);
> break;
>
> case DEVFREQ_GOV_STOP:
> - tegra_actmon_disable_interrupts(tegra);
> + tegra_actmon_stop(tegra);
> devfreq_monitor_stop(devfreq);
> break;
>
> case DEVFREQ_GOV_SUSPEND:
> - tegra_actmon_disable_interrupts(tegra);
> + tegra_actmon_stop(tegra);
> devfreq_monitor_suspend(devfreq);
> break;
>
> case DEVFREQ_GOV_RESUME:
> devfreq_monitor_resume(devfreq);
> - tegra_actmon_enable_interrupts(tegra);
> + tegra_actmon_start(tegra);
> break;
> }
>
> @@ -664,15 +651,10 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> tegra->max_freq = clk_round_rate(tegra->emc_clock, ULONG_MAX) / KHZ;
> tegra->cur_freq = clk_get_rate(tegra->emc_clock) / KHZ;
>
> - actmon_writel(tegra, ACTMON_SAMPLING_PERIOD - 1,
> - ACTMON_GLB_PERIOD_CTRL);
> -
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(actmon_device_configs); i++) {
> dev = tegra->devices + i;
> dev->config = actmon_device_configs + i;
> dev->regs = tegra->regs + dev->config->offset;
> -
> - tegra_actmon_configure_device(tegra, dev);
> }
>
> for (rate = 0; rate <= tegra->max_freq * KHZ; rate++) {
>

I agree to always initialize the device when START or RESUME
and also to reset the device when STOP or SUSPEND.

Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>

--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics