Re: memleak around kobject_init_and_add()

[Tobin C. Harding]

On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 09:28:09PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 06:13:30PM +1000, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > (Note at bottom on reasons for 'To' list 'Cc' list)
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > kobject_init_and_add() seems to be routinely misused.  A failed call to this
> > function requires a call to kobject_put() otherwise we leak memory.
> > 
> > Examples memleaks can be seen in:
> > 
> > 	mm/slub.c
> > 	fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
> > 	fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.h: xfs_sysfs_init()
> > 
> >  Question: Do we fix the misuse or fix the API?
> 
> Fix the misuse.

Following on from this.  It seems we often also forget to call
kobject_uevent() after calls to kobject_init_and_add().  Before I make a
goose of myself patching the whole tree is there ever any reason why we
would _not_ want to call kobject_uevent() after successfully calling
kobject_add() (or kobject_init_and_add())?

Cheers,
Tobin.