Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: stm32: check irq controller availability at probe

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Wed Apr 24 2019 - 06:48:28 EST

Next message: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [RESEND4, PATCH 2/2] fuse: require /dev/fuse reads to have enough buffer capacity as negotiated"
Previous message: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult: "Re: [PATCH 1/4] mod_devicetable: helper macro for declaring oftree module device table"
In reply to: Alexandre Torgue: "Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: stm32: check irq controller availability at probe"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:09 AM Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@xxxxxx> wrote:

> It is not guaranteed that the IRQ controller driver is probed before
> the pin controller driver gets probed.
> Considering this, check for the irq domain availability during probe
> and return EPROBE_DEFER if needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@xxxxxx>

Patch applied with Alexandre's ACK!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Next message: Miklos Szeredi: "Re: [RESEND4, PATCH 2/2] fuse: require /dev/fuse reads to have enough buffer capacity as negotiated"
Previous message: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult: "Re: [PATCH 1/4] mod_devicetable: helper macro for declaring oftree module device table"
In reply to: Alexandre Torgue: "Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: stm32: check irq controller availability at probe"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]