Re: [RFC patch 20/41] backtrace-test: Simplify stack trace handling

[Josh Poimboeuf]

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:28:14PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace by using the storage
> array based interfaces.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/backtracetest.c |   11 +++--------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/kernel/backtracetest.c
> +++ b/kernel/backtracetest.c
> @@ -48,19 +48,14 @@ static void backtrace_test_irq(void)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
>  static void backtrace_test_saved(void)
>  {
> -	struct stack_trace trace;
>  	unsigned long entries[8];
> +	unsigned int nent;

"Nent" isn't immediately readable to my eyes.  How about just good old
"nr_entries"?  (for this patch and all the others)

-- 
Josh