Re: [RFC patch 17/41] tracing: Make stack_trace_print() static and rename it

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:28:11 +0200
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It's only used in the source file where it is defined and it's using the
> stack_trace_ namespace. Rename it to free it up for stack trace related
> functions.
> 

Can you put it back to its original name "print_max_stack()" which was
changed by this commit:

bb99d8ccec7 ("tracing: Allow arch-specific stack tracer")

I actually want to do a clean up and remove all "trace_" functions that
are not a tracepoint. It's getting confusing to see a "trace_..." and
search for the corresponding TRACE_EVENT() macro and not being able to
find it.

Hmm, I'm not sure why Akashi changed that function to be global in the
first place. It looks like only check_stack() needed to be changed.

Akashi?

-- Steve


> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/ftrace.h     |    1 -
>  kernel/trace/trace_stack.c |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> @@ -251,7 +251,6 @@ extern unsigned long stack_trace_max_siz
>  extern arch_spinlock_t stack_trace_max_lock;
>  
>  extern int stack_tracer_enabled;
> -void stack_trace_print(void);
>  int
>  stack_trace_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>  		   void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(stack_sysctl_mutex);
>  int stack_tracer_enabled;
>  static int last_stack_tracer_enabled;
>  
> -void stack_trace_print(void)
> +static void trace_stack_trace_print(void)
>  {
>  	long i;
>  	int size;
> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned l
>  	stack_trace_max.nr_entries = x;
>  
>  	if (task_stack_end_corrupted(current)) {
> -		stack_trace_print();
> +		trace_stack_trace_print();
>  		BUG();
>  	}
>  
>