Re: [PATCH ghak10 v7 2/2] ntp: Audit NTP parameters adjustment

From: Ondrej Mosnacek
Date: Wed Apr 10 2019 - 03:29:44 EST


On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:03 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
> > index 2c62c0468888..1c372ad7ebe9 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/audit.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
> > @@ -86,6 +86,26 @@ struct audit_field {
> > u32 op;
> > };
> >
> > +#define AUDIT_NTP_OFFSET 0
> > +#define AUDIT_NTP_FREQ 1
> > +#define AUDIT_NTP_STATUS 2
> > +#define AUDIT_NTP_TAI 3
> > +#define AUDIT_NTP_TICK 4
> > +#define AUDIT_NTP_ADJUST 5
> > +#define AUDIT_NTP_NVALS 6 /* count */
>
> That should be an named enum and the id argument should be the same type.

I kind of instinctively went for macros to be consistent with the rest
of the file, but on second thought that's really not a good reason to
keep doing the wrong thing... I'll change it to enum in v8.

>
> > @@ -720,14 +721,29 @@ int __do_adjtimex(struct __kernel_timex *txc, const struct timespec64 *ts,
> > /* adjtime() is independent from ntp_adjtime() */
> > time_adjust = txc->offset;
> > ntp_update_frequency();
> > +
> > + audit_ntp_set_old(ad, AUDIT_NTP_ADJUST, save_adjust);
> > + audit_ntp_set_new(ad, AUDIT_NTP_ADJUST, time_adjust);
> > }
> > txc->offset = save_adjust;
> > } else {
> > -
> > /* If there are input parameters, then process them: */
> > - if (txc->modes)
> > + if (txc->modes) {
> > + audit_ntp_set_old(ad, AUDIT_NTP_OFFSET, time_offset);
> > + audit_ntp_set_old(ad, AUDIT_NTP_FREQ, time_freq);
> > + audit_ntp_set_old(ad, AUDIT_NTP_STATUS, time_status);
> > + audit_ntp_set_old(ad, AUDIT_NTP_TAI, *time_tai);
> > + audit_ntp_set_old(ad, AUDIT_NTP_TICK, tick_usec);
> > +
> > process_adjtimex_modes(txc, time_tai);
> >
> > + audit_ntp_set_new(ad, AUDIT_NTP_OFFSET, time_offset);
> > + audit_ntp_set_new(ad, AUDIT_NTP_FREQ, time_freq);
> > + audit_ntp_set_new(ad, AUDIT_NTP_STATUS, time_status);
> > + audit_ntp_set_new(ad, AUDIT_NTP_TAI, *time_tai);
> > + audit_ntp_set_new(ad, AUDIT_NTP_TICK, tick_usec);
> > + }
>
> Yes, that looks much more palatable! Nice work!
>
> With the above addressed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>

Thanks!

--
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace at redhat dot com>
Software Engineer, Security Technologies
Red Hat, Inc.