Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/25] printk: new implementation

[Sebastian Siewior]

On 2019-03-13 09:19:32 [+0100], John Ogness wrote:
> recursive situation. As you are pointing out, the notification/wake
> component of printk_safe will still be needed. I will leave that (small)
> part in printk_safe.c.

Does this mean we keep irq_work part or we bury it and solve it by other
means?

> John Ogness

Sebastian