Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: futex: make futex_detect_cmpxchg more reliable

From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin
Date: Fri Mar 08 2019 - 04:54:25 EST


On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 04:04:23PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:49 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > Underspecification of constraints to extended inline assembly is a
> > > common issue exposed by other compilers (and possibly but in-effect
> > > infrequently compiler upgrades).
> >
> > I don't see what is "underspecified" in the original constraints.
> > Please explain.
>
> From the link:
>
> The problem is that in the T(streq) insn, %3 and %4 MUST be different registers,
> but nothing in the asm() constrains them to be different.

Thanks, but that is not what I'm asking. See my reply to Ard.

--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up