Re: [PATCH v1 13/24] drivers: thermal: tsens: Print IP version

From: Amit Kucheria
Date: Wed Feb 20 2019 - 04:20:08 EST


On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:47 AM Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 04:19:31PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > On some TSENS IP, version is stored. Print that version at init.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > index aae3d71d7eed..39cd5733fd44 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c
> > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> > void __iomem *tm_base, *srot_base;
> > struct device *dev = priv->dev;
> > struct resource *res;
> > - u32 enabled;
> > + u32 enabled, maj_ver, min_ver;
> > int ret, i, j;
> > struct platform_device *op = of_find_device_by_node(priv->dev->of_node);
> >
> > @@ -155,6 +155,27 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> > if (IS_ERR(priv->tm_map))
> > return PTR_ERR(priv->tm_map);
> >
> > + for (i = 0; i < MAX_REGFIELDS; i++) {
> > + priv->rf[i] = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* alloc regmap_fields in srot_map */
> > + if (priv->feat->ver_info) {
> > + for (i = 0, j = VER_MAJOR; i < 2; i++, j++) {
> > + priv->rf[j] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->srot_map,
> > + priv->fields[j]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[j]))
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->rf[j]);
> > + }
> > + ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[VER_MAJOR], &maj_ver);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[VER_MINOR], &min_ver);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + dev_info(dev, "version: %d.%d\n", maj_ver, min_ver);
>
> Is this really needed? Printing stuff into kernel log during boot can
> just add a lot of info that ends up just slowing down things. Besides,
> if this info is important shouldnt be available somewhere else as the
> kernel log is a circular buffer and eventually that line will get
> wrapped up?

Fair point, I'll remove this statement and dump this into debugfs for
which I'll send a separate series adding debugfs support.