Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: mediatek: Register an Energy Model

From: Quentin Perret
Date: Wed Feb 06 2019 - 05:13:25 EST


Hi Matthias,

On Tuesday 05 Feb 2019 at 09:52:25 (-0800), Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Try and register an Energy Model from mediatek-cpufreq to allow
> interested subsystems like the task scheduler to use the provided
> information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> index eb8920d398181..e6168ee582783 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> @@ -460,6 +460,8 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(policy->cpus);

I'm not familiar with the mediatek-cpufreq driver so bear with me, but
the code sets policy->cpus just below here. Is there any particular
reason for not using that in PM_EM ?

> cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, &info->cpus);
> policy->freq_table = freq_table;
> policy->driver_data = info;
> --
> 2.20.1.611.gfbb209baf1-goog
>

Thanks,
Quentin