Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Fix A6XX support for opp-level

From: kbuild test robot
Date: Sun Jan 13 2019 - 16:06:26 EST


Hi Douglas,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on robclark/msm-next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.0-rc1 next-20190111]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Douglas-Anderson/drm-msm-Fix-A6XX-support-for-opp-level/20190114-004951
base: git://people.freedesktop.org/~robclark/linux msm-next
config: arm-defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=7.2.0 make.cross ARCH=arm

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c: In function 'a6xx_gmu_get_arc_level':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c:964:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'dev_pm_opp_get_level'; did you mean 'dev_pm_opp_get_freq'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
val = dev_pm_opp_get_level(opp);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
dev_pm_opp_get_freq
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +964 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c

949
950 /* Return the 'arc-level' for the given frequency */
951 static unsigned int a6xx_gmu_get_arc_level(struct device *dev,
952 unsigned long freq)
953 {
954 struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
955 unsigned int val;
956
957 if (!freq)
958 return 0;
959
960 opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(dev, freq, true);
961 if (IS_ERR(opp))
962 return 0;
963
> 964 val = dev_pm_opp_get_level(opp);
965
966 dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
967
968 return val;
969 }
970

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation

Attachment: .config.gz
Description: application/gzip