Re: [PATCH 27/41] scsi: lpfc: lpfc_scsi: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Date: Thu Jan 10 2019 - 15:24:09 EST


Hi,

Friendly ping (second one):

Who can ack/review/take this patch, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 11/27/18 10:32 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Drop thru" with
"fall through" annotations, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
index baed2b891efb..0eeed6c4c2ee 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
@@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ lpfc_bg_err_inject(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc,
break;
}
- /* Drop thru */
+ /* fall through */
case SCSI_PROT_WRITE_INSERT:
/*
* For WRITE_INSERT, force the error
@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ lpfc_bg_err_inject(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc,
rc = BG_ERR_TGT | BG_ERR_CHECK;
break;
}
- /* Drop thru */
+ /* fall through */
case SCSI_PROT_WRITE_INSERT:
/*
* For WRITE_INSERT, force the
@@ -1628,7 +1628,7 @@ lpfc_bg_err_inject(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct scsi_cmnd *sc,
switch (op) {
case SCSI_PROT_WRITE_PASS:
rc = BG_ERR_CHECK;
- /* Drop thru */
+ /* fall through */
case SCSI_PROT_WRITE_INSERT:
/*
@@ -4115,7 +4115,7 @@ lpfc_scsi_cmd_iocb_cmpl(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *pIocbIn,
lpfc_cmd->cur_iocbq.sli4_lxritag,
0, 0);
}
- /* else: fall through */
+ /* fall through */
default:
cmd->result = DID_ERROR << 16;
break;