[PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/8] rcu: Remove preemption disabling from expedited CPU selection

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Wed Jan 09 2019 - 16:41:55 EST


It turns out that it is queue_delayed_work_on() rather than
queue_work_on() that has difficulties when used concurrently with
CPU-hotplug removal operations. It is therefore unnecessary to protect
CPU identification and queue_work_on() with preempt_disable().

This commit therefore removes the preempt_disable() and preempt_enable()
from sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus(), which has the further benefit of reducing
the number of changes that must be maintained in the -rt patchset.

Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 928fe5893a57..f42c999f4d2d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -449,7 +449,6 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus(smp_call_func_t func)
continue;
}
INIT_WORK(&rnp->rew.rew_work, sync_rcu_exp_select_node_cpus);
- preempt_disable();
cpu = find_next_bit(&rnp->ffmask, BITS_PER_LONG, -1);
/* If all offline, queue the work on an unbound CPU. */
if (unlikely(cpu > rnp->grphi - rnp->grplo))
@@ -457,7 +456,6 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus(smp_call_func_t func)
else
cpu += rnp->grplo;
queue_work_on(cpu, rcu_par_gp_wq, &rnp->rew.rew_work);
- preempt_enable();
rnp->exp_need_flush = true;
}

--
2.17.1