Re: [PATCH 09/41] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcpim: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

Hi,

Friendly ping:

Who can ack or review this patch, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 11/27/18 10:27 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that I replaced "Fall through !!!" with a "fall through"
> annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114971 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcpim.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcpim.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcpim.c
> index 2c85f5b1f9c1..7e996bcf026c 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcpim.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcpim.c
> @@ -2586,6 +2586,7 @@ bfa_ioim_send_ioreq(struct bfa_ioim_s *ioim)
>   	case FCP_IODIR_RW:
>   		bfa_stats(itnim, input_reqs);
>   		bfa_stats(itnim, output_reqs);
> +		/* fall through */
>   	default:
>   		bfi_h2i_set(m->mh, BFI_MC_IOIM_IO, 0, bfa_fn_lpu(ioim->bfa));
>   	}
> @@ -2820,6 +2821,7 @@ bfa_ioim_isr(struct bfa_s *bfa, struct bfi_msg_s *m)
>   
>   	case BFI_IOIM_STS_TIMEDOUT:
>   		bfa_stats(ioim->itnim, iocomp_timedout);
> +		/* fall through */
>   	case BFI_IOIM_STS_ABORTED:
>   		rsp->io_status = BFI_IOIM_STS_ABORTED;
>   		bfa_stats(ioim->itnim, iocomp_aborted);
> @@ -3215,9 +3217,7 @@ bfa_tskim_sm_cleanup_qfull(struct bfa_tskim_s *tskim,
>   	switch (event) {
>   	case BFA_TSKIM_SM_DONE:
>   		bfa_reqq_wcancel(&tskim->reqq_wait);
> -		/*
> -		 * Fall through !!!
> -		 */
> +		/* fall through */
>   	case BFA_TSKIM_SM_QRESUME:
>   		bfa_sm_set_state(tskim, bfa_tskim_sm_cleanup);
>   		bfa_tskim_send_abort(tskim);