Re: [RESEND] PM / Domains: remove define_genpd_open_function() and define_genpd_debugfs_fops()

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Wed Dec 19 2018 - 04:17:52 EST


On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:32 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 09:19:07AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 09:45, Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > We already have the DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE, There is no need to define
> > > such a macro, so remove define_genpd_open_function and
> > > define_genpd_debugfs_fops.
> > >
> > > Convert them to DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 71 +++++++++++++------------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > > index 7f38a92b444a..10a61d6147d0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > > @@ -2671,7 +2671,7 @@ static int genpd_summary_one(struct seq_file *s,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int genpd_summary_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
> > > +static int summary_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
> >
> > Why rename the function(s)?
>
> Because the macro requires it?

Yeah.

Ulf, this looks like a good cleanup to me, any objections to this one
given the explanation above?