Aw: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [DSA] adding fields for holding information about upstream-port

From: Frank Wunderlich
Date: Wed Dec 12 2018 - 10:13:41 EST


Hi Florian,

thank you for first comments. It was my first Patchset i tried to send ia git send-email. i had searched the Patch 0/x-option but had not found it. i will rework this.

- i did only a porting to 4.15+ dsa-core. how do i credit John in this series?
- maybe i need a fallback to current "first cpu-port option", this was not defined by john, but i can add it in next series
- should i include dts (bananapi r2) also in the series?
- i have a additional patch renaming dts-option to default_cpu instead of cpu (hint of Andrew)

regards Frank


> Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2018 um 23:37 Uhr
> Von: "Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> An: "Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@xxxxxxx>, "Vivien Didelot" <vivien.didelot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [DSA] adding fields for holding information about upstream-port
>
> Hi,,
>
> On 12/11/18 11:33 AM, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > based on
> > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/target/linux/mediatek/patches-4.14/0033-dsa-multi-cpu.patch
>
> There are several stylistic as well as logistical/technical issues with
> this patch series, so please address those before we can start doing the
> technical review:
>
> - this is a multi patch series, so a cover letter should be provided
> (can be done with git format-patch --cover-letter)
>
> - subject for the patches should be prefixed with net: dsa: <subject>
>
> - commit messages explaining what is being achieved, how and what
> problem/feature this is providing is mandatory, you cannot just take
> patches from OpenWrt and provide no context what so ever except from the
> subject
>
> Please fix that so we can do a meaningful and constructive technical
> review of the patches.
>
> Thank you
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/net/dsa.h | 4 ++++
> > net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
> > index 23690c44e167..3efa81e08993 100644
> > --- a/include/net/dsa.h
> > +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
> > @@ -203,6 +203,10 @@ struct dsa_port {
> > struct net_device *bridge_dev;
> > struct devlink_port devlink_port;
> > struct phylink *pl;
> > +
> > + struct net_device *ethernet;
> > + int upstream;
> > +
> > /*
> > * Original copy of the master netdev ethtool_ops
> > */
> > diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
> > index 9e4fd04ab53c..cc0cd7675117 100644
> > --- a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
> > +++ b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
> > @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ struct dsa_slave_priv {
> >
> > /* TC context */
> > struct list_head mall_tc_list;
> > +
> > + struct net_device *master;
> > };
> >
> > /* dsa.c */
> > @@ -188,7 +190,10 @@ static inline struct net_device *
> > dsa_slave_to_master(const struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> > struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
> > + struct dsa_slave_priv *p = netdev_priv(dev);
> >
> > + if (p->master)
> > + return p->master;
> > return dp->cpu_dp->master;
> > }
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Florian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
>