Re: [PATCH v5 19/25] xtensa: define syscall_get_* functions

From: Max Filippov
Date: Mon Dec 10 2018 - 16:30:01 EST


On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:30 PM Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:24:02PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:14:37PM -0800, Max Filippov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:53 AM Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 09:02:50PM -0800, Max Filippov wrote:
> > > > > How should we synchronize our changes?
> > > >
> > > > No problem, I can revert to the previous edition of this patch
> > > > that just adds syscall_get_arch.
> > > > Alternatively, you can just take that couple of patches (v5 18/25
> > > > and v2 15/15) into your tree.
> > >
> > > Sure I can do the second. Will it work for v2 16/15 that changes
> > > syscall_get_arch adding an argument to it?
> >
> > No, I'm afraid it won't work for v2 16/15 (aka v5 22/25), which means
> > I'd have to keep them in the series.
>
> You can surely take them into your tree, but I'll have to keep them
> in the series because of that change of syscall_get_arch signature.
> Sorry for confusion.

Ok, no problem, I'll take them. I'm planning to merge this branch into the
for-next in a couple of days, let's see how it goes after that.

--
Thanks.
-- Max