Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] phy: qcom-qmp: Fix clock-cells binding and provider

From: Vivek Gautam
Date: Fri Dec 07 2018 - 01:25:56 EST


Hi,

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:15 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Vivek,
>
> On 04/12/18 6:07 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > Hi Kishon,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 1:44 PM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Andy Gross, David Brown, Vivek,
> >>
> >> On 30/11/18 3:43 AM, Evan Green wrote:
> >>> This series fixes the QMP PHY bindings, which had specified #clock-cells
> >>> in the parent node, and had set it to 1. Putting it in the parent node is
> >>> wrong because the clock providers are the child nodes, so this change
> >>> moves it there. Having it set to 1 is also wrong, since nothing is ever
> >>> specified as to what should go in that cell. So this changes it to zero.
> >>> Finally, this change completes a little bit of code to actually allow these
> >>> exposed clocks to be pointed at in DT.
> >>>
> >>> I had no idea how to fix up ipq8074.dtsi. It seems to be completely wrong in
> >>> that it doesn't specify #clock-cells at all, has no child nodes, and
> >>> specifies clock-output-names in the parent node. As far as I can tell this
> >>> doesn't work at all. But I can't add the child nodes myself because I don't know
> >>> 1) how many there are, and 2) the registers in them. I also have no way to test it.
> >>>
> >>> Speaking of testing, I was able to test this on sdm845, but haven't tested msm8996.
> >>
> >> Can someone help test this series in msm8996?
> >
> > Sure, will give it a try tomorrow.
>
> I'm planning to close the merge by today. Can you test this series please?

Sorry, got held up with an issue yesterday. Will update you in couple of hours.

Thanks
Vivek

[snip]


--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation