[PATCH] rtc: proc: printf using alarm for alrm

[yuankuiz]

Hi,

From 549bae59445c5ec67dd6a46f3ea4f58966d40c9b

Current the struct rtc_wkalrm is dumped as
"alrm_" by printing converted from the struct
name of "alrm.*" directly. Shall we use the
"alarm *" to replace the "alrm_*" during this
dumping?

Signed-off-by: John Zhao <yuankuiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
index a9dd921..d4a3c91 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void 
*offset)

 	err = rtc_read_alarm(rtc, &alrm);
 	if (err == 0) {
-		seq_printf(seq, "alrm_time\t: ");
+		seq_printf(seq, "alarm time\t: ");
 		if ((unsigned int)alrm.time.tm_hour <= 24)
 			seq_printf(seq, "%02d:", alrm.time.tm_hour);
 		else
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void 
*offset)
 		else
 			seq_printf(seq, "**\n");

-		seq_printf(seq, "alrm_date\t: ");
+		seq_printf(seq, "alarm date\t: ");
 		if ((unsigned int)alrm.time.tm_year <= 200)
 			seq_printf(seq, "%04d-", alrm.time.tm_year + 1900);
 		else
@@ -85,9 +85,9 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void 
*offset)
 			seq_printf(seq, "%02d\n", alrm.time.tm_mday);
 		else
 			seq_printf(seq, "**\n");
-		seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n",
+		seq_printf(seq, "alarm IRQ\t: %s\n",
 				alrm.enabled ? "yes" : "no");
-		seq_printf(seq, "alrm_pending\t: %s\n",
+		seq_printf(seq, "alarm pending\t: %s\n",
 				alrm.pending ? "yes" : "no");
 		seq_printf(seq, "update IRQ enabled\t: %s\n",
 			(rtc->uie_rtctimer.enabled) ? "yes" : "no");
--
2.7.4