[tip:x86/mm] x86/fault: Make error_code sanitization more robust

From: tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
Date: Tue Nov 20 2018 - 03:18:05 EST


Commit-ID: e49d3cbef0176c182b86206185f137a87f16ab91
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/e49d3cbef0176c182b86206185f137a87f16ab91
Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:45:31 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 08:44:29 +0100

x86/fault: Make error_code sanitization more robust

The error code in a page fault on a kernel address indicates
whether that address is mapped, which should not be revealed in a signal.

The normal code path for a page fault on a kernel address sanitizes the bit,
but the paths for vsyscall emulation and SIGBUS do not. Both are
harmless, but for subtle reasons. SIGBUS is never sent for a kernel
address, and vsyscall emulation will never fault on a kernel address
per se because it will fail an access_ok() check instead.

Make the code more robust by adding a helper that sets the relevant
fields and sanitizing the error code in the helper. This also
cleans up the code -- we had three copies of roughly the same thing.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b31159bd55bd0c4fa061a20dfd6c429c094bebaa.1542667307.git.luto@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 3c9aed03d18e..b5ec1ca2f4a0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -631,6 +631,24 @@ pgtable_bad(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
oops_end(flags, regs, sig);
}

+static void set_signal_archinfo(unsigned long address,
+ unsigned long error_code)
+{
+ struct task_struct *tsk = current;
+
+ /*
+ * To avoid leaking information about the kernel page
+ * table layout, pretend that user-mode accesses to
+ * kernel addresses are always protection faults.
+ */
+ if (address >= TASK_SIZE_MAX)
+ error_code |= X86_PF_PROT;
+
+ tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_PF;
+ tsk->thread.error_code = error_code | X86_PF_USER;
+ tsk->thread.cr2 = address;
+}
+
static noinline void
no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
unsigned long address, int signal, int si_code)
@@ -656,9 +674,7 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
* faulting through the emulate_vsyscall() logic.
*/
if (current->thread.sig_on_uaccess_err && signal) {
- tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_PF;
- tsk->thread.error_code = error_code | X86_PF_USER;
- tsk->thread.cr2 = address;
+ set_signal_archinfo(address, error_code);

/* XXX: hwpoison faults will set the wrong code. */
force_sig_fault(signal, si_code, (void __user *)address,
@@ -821,9 +837,7 @@ __bad_area_nosemaphore(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
if (likely(show_unhandled_signals))
show_signal_msg(regs, error_code, address, tsk);

- tsk->thread.cr2 = address;
- tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
- tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_PF;
+ set_signal_archinfo(address, error_code);

if (si_code == SEGV_PKUERR)
force_sig_pkuerr((void __user *)address, pkey);
@@ -937,9 +951,7 @@ do_sigbus(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long address,
if (is_prefetch(regs, error_code, address))
return;

- tsk->thread.cr2 = address;
- tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
- tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_PF;
+ set_signal_archinfo(address, error_code);

#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
if (fault & (VM_FAULT_HWPOISON|VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE)) {