[PATCH V10 10/19] block: loop: pass multi-page bvec to iov_iter

From: Ming Lei
Date: Thu Nov 15 2018 - 03:56:00 EST


iov_iter is implemented with bvec itererator, so it is safe to pass
multipage bvec to it, and this way is much more efficient than
passing one page in each bvec.

Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-erofs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index bf6bc35aaf88..a3fd418ec637 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -515,16 +515,16 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
struct bio *bio = rq->bio;
struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
unsigned int offset;
- int segments = 0;
+ int nr_bvec = 0;
int ret;

if (rq->bio != rq->biotail) {
- struct req_iterator iter;
+ struct bvec_iter iter;
struct bio_vec tmp;

__rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq)
- segments += bio_segments(bio);
- bvec = kmalloc_array(segments, sizeof(struct bio_vec),
+ nr_bvec += bio_bvecs(bio);
+ bvec = kmalloc_array(nr_bvec, sizeof(struct bio_vec),
GFP_NOIO);
if (!bvec)
return -EIO;
@@ -533,13 +533,14 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
/*
* The bios of the request may be started from the middle of
* the 'bvec' because of bio splitting, so we can't directly
- * copy bio->bi_iov_vec to new bvec. The rq_for_each_segment
+ * copy bio->bi_iov_vec to new bvec. The bio_for_each_bvec
* API will take care of all details for us.
*/
- rq_for_each_segment(tmp, rq, iter) {
- *bvec = tmp;
- bvec++;
- }
+ __rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq)
+ bio_for_each_bvec(tmp, bio, iter) {
+ *bvec = tmp;
+ bvec++;
+ }
bvec = cmd->bvec;
offset = 0;
} else {
@@ -550,11 +551,11 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
*/
offset = bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done;
bvec = __bvec_iter_bvec(bio->bi_io_vec, bio->bi_iter);
- segments = bio_segments(bio);
+ nr_bvec = bio_bvecs(bio);
}
atomic_set(&cmd->ref, 2);

- iov_iter_bvec(&iter, rw, bvec, segments, blk_rq_bytes(rq));
+ iov_iter_bvec(&iter, rw, bvec, nr_bvec, blk_rq_bytes(rq));
iter.iov_offset = offset;

cmd->iocb.ki_pos = pos;
--
2.9.5