Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: module: Fix function kallsyms on Thumb-2

From: Jessica Yu
Date: Wed Nov 14 2018 - 10:15:46 EST


+++ Dave Martin [13/11/18 13:57 +0000]:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:27:45PM +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
Thumb-2 functions have the lowest bit set in the symbol value in the
symtab. When kallsyms are generated for the vmlinux, the kallsyms are
generated from the output of nm, and nm clears the lowest bit.

$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-readelf -a vmlinux | grep show_interrupts
95947: 8015dc89 686 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 2 show_interrupts
$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-nm vmlinux | grep show_interrupts
8015dc88 T show_interrupts
$ cat /proc/kallsyms | grep show_interrupts
8015dc88 T show_interrupts

However, for modules, the kallsyms uses the values in the symbol table
without modification, so for functions in modules, the lowest bit is set
in kallsyms.

$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-readelf -a drivers/net/tun.ko | grep tun_get_socket
268: 000000e1 44 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 2 tun_get_socket
$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-nm drivers/net/tun.ko | grep tun_get_socket
000000e0 T tun_get_socket
$ cat /proc/kallsyms | grep tun_get_socket
7fcd30e1 t tun_get_socket [tun]

Because of this, the offset of the crashing instruction shown in oopses
is incorrect when the crash is in a module. For example, given a
tun_get_socket which starts like this,

000000e0 <tun_get_socket>:
e0: b500 push {lr}
e2: f7ff fffe bl 0 <__gnu_mcount_nc>
e6: 4b08 ldr r3, [pc, #32]
e8: 6942 ldr r2, [r0, #20]
ea: 429a cmp r2, r3
ec: d002 beq.n f4 <tun_get_socket+0x14>

a crash when tun_get_socket is called with NULL results in:

PC is at tun_get_socket+0x7/0x2c [tun]
pc : [<7fcdb0e8>]

which can result in the incorrect line being reported by gdb if this
symbol+offset is used there. If the crash is on the first instruction
of a function, the "PC is at" line would also report the symbol name of
the preceding function.

To solve this, introduce a weak module_kallsyms_symbol_value() function
which arches can override to fix up these symbol values, and implement

(Jumping into this patch without having reviewed previous versions in
detail, so I may have misunderstood some things...)


Anyway:

I prefer this to the previous approach of directly hacking the symbol
values in the module kallsyms table.

this for Thumb-2. We need to move elf_type() to st_other so that the
original value of st_info is preserved.

Are you sure modifying st_other won't break anything?

It's hard to imagine how ELF symbol visibility would be relevant in the
kernel, but some arches put other stuff in st_other. See alpha,
powerpc, sh for example. I haven't attempted to understand whether any
of those uses matters here.

Yeah, the st_other field is used to apply relocations in those arches
you mention. Overwriting st_info/st_other only "works" here in the
sense that that field is no longer needed after applying relocations
(add_kallsyms() is called in post_relocation() in the module loader).
I agree it's hacky to reuse the field in that way, though.

Ideally, we wouldn't abuse st_info to store elf_type() in the first
place, but that may be messier to solve. kallsyms could wrap the
ElfXX_Sym in another struct to store extra metadata for example, but it
would increase runtime memory consumption.

Yeah, I've always thought that was ugly. I think it was done as a
small optimization for kallsyms, so that we're not looking up what
char to print for every symbol, so the st_info field was repurposed
for this.

Another option would be wedge STT_FUNC in bit 7 of st_info, say.
Since elf_type() always yields an ASCII char, that bit shouldn't be
used for anything today. We would of course need to wrap further
access to st_info to mask that bit off as appropriate.

Hm, actually on second thought, I don't think the st_size field is
used *anywhere* in the module loader, not in the arch-specific
relocation code nor in kallsyms. Perhaps that field could be used to
store the output of elf_type instead. Then we won't run into any
issues with delayed relocations with livepatch, as the st_size field
isn't used at all for applying relocs anyway. Since this field is not
used at runtime, I think we can use st_size instead of st_other or
st_info, which are two fields that some arches do use to apply relocs.
Would be great if someone could confirm/fact-check me on this.

Thanks!

Jessica