Re: [PATCH 3/3] lockdep: Use line-buffered printk() for lockdep messages.

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (11/06/18 09:38), Petr Mladek wrote:
> 
> If you would want to avoid buffering, you could set the number
> of buffers to zero. Then it would always fallback to
> the direct printk().

This printk-fallback makes me wonder if 'cont' really can ever go away.
We would totally break cont printk-s that trapped into printk-fallback;
as opposed to current sometimes-cont-works-just-fine.

	-ss